Lance Armstrong Faces New Doping Charges – NYTimes.com

Lance Armstrong Faces New Doping Charges – NYTimes.com.

These allegations have been ongoing for years against Lance Armstrong.  Guilty or not he has been humiliated enough with the recycled testimony of the so called anonymous former teammates.  I can go on and on about the good he has done for cancer patients and cancer research itself, but that isn’t what bothers me.

What bothers me most is the amount of time the government has spent on investigating Lance Armstrong, as well as several other athletes like Roger Clemens and Barry Bonds.  At some point the government just needs to put these supposed charges to rest and move on, which should have happened long ago.

So many other riders were found guilty well within a year of charges being brought against them.  But this has gone on long enough.  Floyd Landis was caught and stripped almost immediately of his Tour de France title and is pretty much wrecked his career, along with a bum hip.

If you have solid proof, use it, but if you don’t stop dancing around every year or two that you have new charges.  How much have these investigations cost the tax payers?  I am tired of hearing about this beer can that contains contaminated evidence Clemens doped.  Did someone save Lance’s lost testical inside a bottle of FRS?

If the government presses on with investigating because of Lance’s previous affiliation with the United States Postal Service, then I have to ask why was there no government audits of where the money was going to?  That is a problem of the government anyways, they do not audit their money trail very well.  So, lets backtrack and clean up after ourselves by spending probably as much money as they paid to the USPS cycling team as they are spending on the legal costs of all of the investigating.

We all know guys like Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens are a-holes, but lets cut them a break for once and spend that money on more useful things, like helping starving kids eat, paving the way for an improved economy, or paying off your government debts.  Instead the government should create better audit trails, support the improvement of drug testing, and other stopgaps that could prevent future messes like the ones they are caught up in now.

About these ads

U.S. State Department chooses Amazon's Kindle over Apple's iPad

Reblogged from VentureBeat:

Click to visit the original post

Apple's iPad may get the headlines and the market share, but Amazon's Kindle looks like a better choice to at least one federal agency. Today Amazon agreed to a no-bid, $16.5 million contract with the U.S. State Department to provide 2,500 Kindle Touches for the government’s overseas language-education programs.

The document released today identifies the State Department’s need for a program that provides “a secure, centrally managed content distribution and management platform to centrally manage an unlimited number of e-reader/tablet devices.” and unfortunately Apple’s iPad falls short of this requirement, according to the State Department.

Read more… 157 more words

There are four things that immediately strike me about the Department of State choosing a Kindle over the iPad.   First, not everyone can afford to or wants to pay the premium price for an iPad. This goes for pretty much all Apple devices. Most of their computers are far more costly than other options, like the Kindle. So this will obviously save DoS some money. Just look at the picture; the iPad shown looks to have AT&T, so that means it costs a minimum of $550. The Kindle Touch costs between $99 and $149.   Second, Apple products are more popular with the creative types, not for cheaper, overseas learning programs. The security issue that they are probably most concerned about is theft, because they would sell for far more on the black market than a Kindle. The Kindles are a great product and do enough for the purpose they will serve.   Third, from what I have heard around the street, Amazon and their Cloud services already have a good relationship with several departments, such as DoS. It would make sense for DoS to manage devices centrally over the Cloud services they have already worked with at Amazon, and to use the devices already set up to run on them.   Lastly, $16.5 million and 2,500 devices is maybe a slight scratch to the business Apple does with their iPad devices. So this is in no way a huge loss for Apple or a huge win for Amazon. But it is a big win for the Department of State for not overspending on something more than what they really need.

Boost Needed For U.S. Health and Communications

I just read about Barack Obama’s big idea to digitize health records. Good thing George Bush invented the Internet to pave the way for that possibility. Seriously, that idea has been around for awhile, but I’ll give credit to Obama if he actually puts it into effect and it becomes a reality. To his credit, Bush laid down some (only some as Bush turned down a child health care plan) technology framework to make it a foreseeable possibility. Will it happen? It needs to.

To digitize the health records, we will need to severely improve on our communication infrastructure. I liken our health and communication infrastructure to Barry Bonds. They hit a lot of home runs in getting things right, but once in awhile they strike out and lack in positive production. Once in awhile, someone does something illegal and gets into a lot of trouble (well he isn’t proven guilty yet), and not to mention the aging. Old age slows anything down, causing value to drop. Barry tried some quick fixes to lengthen his career, and the U.S. does as well with health and communication, but quick fixes don’t work. We need change.

Obama ran his race on the platform of promised change, and now the stage is his. We all know our economy needs a huge boost, and Obama knows this as well. One reason I believe it has sank is because we have fallen behind in cutting-edge technology and modernized infrastructure. Our technology infrastructure is not where it can and should be. How can the country who spends the most on energy, and really on almost anything, have an infrastructure that lags? I am real interested to see what happens with the stimulus, which hopefully goes to improve the health and communication infrastructures.

To improve health, we need to improve our communication technology. For a country with our resources, our wireless infrastructure really lacks. Gradually we are getting up to a 3G network across the country, but too many spots lack in that coverage. I live outside DC, coverage should always be full. Why am I sitting in my office off a major interstate and I only have one bar? Also, why am I so close to our nation’s capital and the power always goes out? I work in a very large business area, and already this year, the power has gone out three times. Signs of an aging power system, which heavily affects our communication infrastructure and the hospital that is right down the street from my office.

We need a boost. We should have improved, more cost-effective ways to further minimize down time of our power, digital, and mobile communication infrastructures. Once we improve on that, we can begin to build our 21st century digital health care system. We need to do away with paper patient files. Our health records should be available in a digital format, and not just because it saves trees. A standardized system of digital records would allow for quicker, easier access by doctors to diagnose patients faster. Doctors will be able to view past medical history and known allergies, as well as have insurance and emergency contact information available if ever necessary. These improvements alone would cause a significant drop in medical malpractice.

Digital health records would benefit the patient as well. Records would also be available for our own personal use. We can check to see when we last had a physical, what medicine was prescribed, and view past x-rays. Family’s can review visits for their children, and make payments online. Another improvement that would be great would be a system that links the doctor to the pharmacy. It would save time and money if a patient received a prescription, the doctor sends it to the patient’s preferred pharmacy, the prescription is ready for pickup as soon as the patient arrives at the pharmacy. Why should we have to take a paper and sit around for an hour for someone to fill a bottle with a few pills?

These are just a few ideas right now, but all greatly possible with an improved digital health care system, made possible by an improved communication infrastructure. An improved health care system would definitely decrease the costs of health care, but will it happen? There are so many dependencies. For one, the aforementioned communication infrastructure needs to be improved. Also, a lot of money will need to be fronted by the government to assist with such a huge makeover. There will be a lack of qualified personnel to make such an upgrade possible, so money will need to be placed into training individuals. The pros though would be the decreased health costs, improved systems, and the creation of a lot of new jobs to make this initiative possible; all boosts for a lagging economy.

Obama, you made the call for change. The ball is in your court. Let’s make it happen.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers

%d bloggers like this: